It is always a pleasure to read
a well-written well-reasoned critique of
a work with which one is
not only
familiar
but which holds
a special place in one’s heart
Thank you for
your exe-
gesis on
Twelfth Night
As always
the pleasure to be found in
a meaty
formalist
essay
based on a close reading of something in the canon
is derived
not from acquiring
a deeper understanding
of the author’s intentions
Shakespeare would have
been as bemused by your analysis
of Twelfth Night
as by a discussion of
Hamlet’s Oedipus complex
but from the intricacies
of the critic’s thought
and the wide-ranging references
which weave them together
It was a bit disappointing
but hardly surprising
to find that your intention
like that of some of the foundational practitioners of
formalist criticism
was to discover a connection
between a canonical work and
a currently fashionable point of view
taken for granted as
dogma
and therefore as
universally applicable
Back then it was
Marxism or
psychoanalysis
now it is
and man oh man I am sorry
simply as a conservative
when it comes to the English language
to have to seriously
inscribe this word
Wokeism.
Nevertheless
I must thank you again
not only for
your lucid argumentation
but for
liberating from obscurity a compelling
Shakespearian passage upholding
the right of asylum
from Thomas More
If it was
written by Shakespeare
and let’s say it was
then
yes
Shakespeare may indeed have had a
passionate
appreciation
of that right
But if that is the case
he
evidently
felt no need to
curb its expression
no need
for example
to bury his enthusiasm
in opaque allusions in
Twelfth Night
where it might be exhumed
centuries later
by an intrepid literary archeologist